An activist thinks the Smiths Group share price is too low. These first-half results might show why

Smiths Group (LSE: SMIN) posted a 9.5% jump in first-half headline operating profit on Tuesday (25 March), but the share price didn’t do much in response.

As I write, we’re looking at a rise of just 1.6% on the day. But Smiths shares have climbed 22% in the past 12 months and 81% in five years.

Pressure to move

The global engineering firm has been under pressure to consider a move to list on the New York stock market. US activist investor Engine Capital has been urging that as one possible way to maximise shareholder value. And US-listed stocks do often command higher price-to-earnings (P/E) valuations than their London sector rivals.

In a recent interview with Reuters, CEO Roland Carter said: “We never say never. We’ve been listed for over 110 years on the London Stock Exchange. So… we intend to remain a FTSE 100 company for now.

But this new results update does seem to be heavy on the shareholder value theme. As an example, Carter also said: “Our strong cash generation enables us to continue to invest in the business… whilst being able to distribute significant capital to shareholders. We believe this will deliver substantial value creation.”

Strategic change

The company reminded us of “strategic actions to unlock significant value announced in January“, adding that “separation processes for Smiths Interconnect and Smiths Detection” are underway. Those divisions are involved in electronic component supplies and airport baggage screening.

The focus now is going to be on “high-performance industrial technology businesses of John Crane and Flex-Tek with significant opportunities to enhance growth, improve the financial profile and deliver strong returns.”

Smiths Group is clearly going through a time of transition. And I do think this investor activism has possibly got the board a bit rattled. But does the stock really look undervalued?

Valuation

That operating profit rise came from a 6.7% increase in revenue. And at the bottom line, it translated into earnings per share (EPS) of 55.5p, up 14%. Again, this is on a non-standard headline basis. Assuming it doubles for the full year, we’d be looking at a P/E of 18 based on the previous closing share price.

Using the statutory EPS figure of 48.8p would take the P/E to a bit over 20. And that’s largely in line with analyst forecasts of 21 for the current year. They also see it dropping as low as 16.5 by 2027.

That isn’t obviously cheap compared to the long-term FTSE 100 average. But for a company with strong earnings growth on the cards it could look a bit feeble. Then compare that with typical P/E values for similar companies listed in New York… and I think I’m starting to see what this Engine Capital investor is on about.

What next?

I feel the uncertainty resulting from ths ongoing transition could keep the share price down for some time. Still, analysts have a consensus price target of 2,300p, up 13%. For investors who understand the long-term prospects, Smiths surely could be worth considering at today’s valuation.

The post An activist thinks the Smiths Group share price is too low. These first-half results might show why appeared first on The Motley Fool UK.

5 Shares for the Future of Energy

Investors who don’t own energy shares need to see this now.

Because Mark Rogers — The Motley Fool UK’s Director of Investing — sees 2 key reasons why energy is set to soar.

While sanctions slam Russian supplies, nations are also racing to achieve net zero emissions, he says. Mark believes 5 companies in particular are poised for spectacular profits.

Open this new report5 Shares for the Future of Energy — and discover:

  • Britain’s Energy Fort Knox, now controlling 30% of UK energy storage
  • How to potentially get paid by the weather
  • Electric Vehicles’ secret backdoor opportunity
  • One dead simple stock for the new nuclear boom

Click the button below to find out how you can get your hands on the full report now, and as a thank you for your interest, we’ll send you one of the five picks — absolutely free!

Grab your FREE Energy recommendation now

More reading

Alan Oscroft has no position in any of the shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has no position in any of the shares mentioned. Views expressed on the companies mentioned in this article are those of the writer and therefore may differ from the official recommendations we make in our subscription services such as Share Advisor, Hidden Winners and Pro. Here at The Motley Fool we believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.